New Membership Renewal Membership Youth Membership

Day: August 11, 2016

MWF commends the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission for rejecting questionable elk hazing plan

by

Elk in Shrub Photo Credit: Matt Patrias

The Montana Wildlife Federation (MWF) commends the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission for rejecting a proposal that would have allowed hazing of elk perceived to have been exposed to brucellosis from other elk.

The proposal was a change to the Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks’ annual elk brucellosis management plan, which lays out management actions in areas where brucellosis is prevalent in order to keep elk and cattle separated. Brucellosis, a domestic livestock disease introduced into elk herds, causes elk and livestock to abort their calves.

The new plan would have allowed hazing to keep separate elk herds, a move that hunters find impossible to implement and expensive, with almost no chance of being successful.

“Knowing which elk have not been exposed to brucellosis is a huge challenge in itself, realizing how many elk could be involved and how mobile elk can be,” testified Nick Gevock, MWF conservation director, at the Commission’s meeting. “And where would the funding come from to implement this plan?”

Fish and Wildlife Commissioners agreed that the plan had too many problems. They recognized that both the livestock industry and wildlife advocates share the goal of having wildlife on the landscape, a healthy agriculture industry and keeping the designated zone around Yellowstone National Park where cattle are monitored at its current size. Commissioners urged agricultural interests to reach out to the hunting community to continue working on solutions for this complicated issue.

“This is a complicated issue, but MWF is eager to work with Montana’s ranchers to find a way to protect their industry while also protecting the public’s big game,” said Gevock.

Let’s Honor Our Promises: Protect Sage-Grouse

by

Sage Grouse. Photos by Bob Wick, BLM Photo Credit:Bob Wick, BLM

Montana’s sage-grouse season opens Sept. 1 and runs through the month, closing Sept. 30. The fact that there is a hunting season at all is a testament to the conservation work that has been done in Montana. Sage-grouse populations struggle when their habitat is fragmented. Impacts from energy development and the conversion of sagebrush steppe habitat to cropland are bigger threats than any of the bird’s natural predators. However, decades of efforts at monitoring sage grouse and conserving their habitat in Montana has paid off. Last August, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service decided the bird didn’t warrant listing on the Endangered Species List because of the ongoing conservation work in Montana and throughout their range.

Here in Montana, the sage brush habitat that the bird resides is also the habitat that produces our world class game. Mule deer, elk, antelope, and hundreds of non-game species rely on the same intact habitat. The unparalleled efforts of ranchers, conservation groups, federal land managers and the state working together on habitat conservation is the primary reason why we have kept the greater sage-grouse under state management. The state and federal plans have the ability to adapt to changing circumstances and science, while ensuring the best path forward to achieving abundant populations of the bird and better management of our public lands. The plans for the Bureau of Land Management in the Billings, Hi Line and Miles City regions outline a comprehensive framework to guide future management decisions for all resource values and program areas, while addressing threats to the sage-grouse. The plans focus protections on the areas of highest importance to the species. They are being implemented with input from local working groups and in coordination with the Montana Sage Grouse Oversight Team.

While keeping the bird from being listed under the Endangered Species Act was a huge win for us all, it was only the starting point. Now, all the stakeholders in Montana that kept the bird from being listed a year ago, must follow through with the commitments we made to other western states and our partners in the federal government. We need to live up to our end of the bargain.

Senator Steve Daines and Congressman Ryan Zinke have both criticized the BLM sage-grouse plans and called for funding cuts and delays. Montanans cannot afford to roll back all the work that has been done to protect and enhance the bird and its habitat. Instead of criticizing the BLM plans and setting them up to fail, we need to roll our sleeves and work together with creative ideas. If we succeed, we will be able to protect working farms and ranches and have hunting seasons for this iconic bird for years to come. That’s a win for us all.

John Bradley is Montana Wildlife Federation’s Eastern Field Rep. based in Billings. He can be reached at jbradley@mtwf.org

New Federal Funds for Wildlife Conservation

by

Many people have never even heard of two of the most important conservation laws of the 20th century: the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Act of 1937 and the Dingell-Johnson Sportfish Restoration Act of 1950.

Under these laws, federal excise taxes on guns, ammunition, and fishing gear are dedicated to conserving fish and wildlife and providing access for the public to enjoy the resources. These dollars are kept out of the federal budget, helping ensure that wildlife management avoids the dysfunction that plagues our political system.

Passage of the Pittman-Robertson Act was one of the National Wildlife Federation’s first major accomplishments, and the Montana Wildlife Federation was there from day one.  We also helped pass Dingell-Johnson Act as well.

Just like the hunting license model at the state level, Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson embody a “user-pays” system in which hunters and anglers finance wildlife management. Over the last 75 years, these programs have provided the foundation for the recovery and management of our most treasured game and sportfish species. From white-tailed deer to pronghorn to cutthroat trout – animals that were on the brink of extinction a century ago are now abundant.

While many hunters and anglers know about how their excise tax dollars go into Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson, the programs are not well known to the general public. In addition, because Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson are funded by taxes on hunters and anglers, Americans who don’t hunt and fish aren’t contributing to the program’s work to protect our wildlife heritage.

More than a dozen years ago, some in Congress recognized this problem and created a third program called the “Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program.” This program was meant to be the “third leg” of the American wildlife conservation funding system, providing a way for all Americans to support wildlife conservation alongside Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson. Unfortunately, unlike the Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson excise taxes, the WCRP was not established with any source of funds.

Earlier this summer, Representatives Don Young (R-Alaska) and Debbie Dingell (D-Michigan) introduced the Recovering America’s Wildlife Act of 2016 (H.R. 5650) to finish the job of funding the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program.  This bill would  dedicate $1.3 billion of existing federal revenue from oil and gas development on public lands and waters to the Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program.  This bold legislation is the direct of a recommendation from a  Blue Ribbon Panel that included leaders from conservation groups, wildlife agencies, businesses, and the oil and gas industry.

If conservationists, wildlife managers, the oil and gas industry, and outdoor businesses can find common ground, our political leaders should be able to take action to adopt their recommendations.  We need to act now to carry the legacy of Pittman-Robertson and Dingell-Johnson into the next century and enact dedicated funding to prevent wildlife from becoming endangered.

Take Action: Ask Congress to Pass HR 5650!

Jeff Lukas – MWF Elk Campaign Manager

Jeff Lukas

Elk Campaign Manager

Jeff Lukas is a passionate conservationist who has been fishing and hunting his entire life. Whether it’s floating a small stream chasing trout, pursuing elk in the high country, or waiting in a blind for ducks to set their wings, Jeff is always trying to bring more people afield to show them what we are trying to protect. He loves being in the arena, and he will never shy away from conversations about the beautiful and unique corners of Big Sky country.